At Study Find, we combine speed with meticulous accuracy. Our Fast-Check Policy ensures every statistic, claim, and study reference is scrutinized to protect our readers from misinformation.
Fact-Checking Standards
1. Source Credibility
- Primary Sources: Data is pulled directly from original studies, clinical trials, or official repositories (e.g., NIH ClinicalTrials.gov).
- Secondary Sources: Reputable science communicators (e.g., Nature News, Science Magazine) are used only when primary sources are inaccessible.
2. Verification Process
- Statistical Claims: Numbers (e.g., “70% of patients saw improvement”) are traced back to methodology sections of studies.
- Context Checks: We confirm that findings aren’t misrepresented (e.g., correlation vs. causation).
- Image/Graph Validation: Charts and graphs are cross-checked against original datasets.
3. Expert Review
- Content on specialized topics (e.g., vaccine efficacy, AI ethics) is reviewed by:
- PhD researchers in relevant fields.
- Professionals with published work on the subject.
- University-affiliated fact-checkers.
Corrections
- Critical errors (e.g., misstated study results) are corrected within 12 hours.
- Minor updates (e.g., typographical fixes) include a timestamp in the article footer.
Transparency
- No third party (sponsors, advertisers, or partners) is involved in fact-checking decisions.
- Funding sources for studies we cover are disclosed (e.g., “This trial was funded by Pfizer”).
Your Role
Call us out! If a claim seems questionable, email Contact@studyfind.org with:
- The article title and specific section in question.
- Links to credible sources that challenge the information.
Why We Fast-Check
In an era of information overload, half-truths spread faster than facts. We’re here to hit the brakes on inaccuracy—without sacrificing clarity.